http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=589396


in reply to Re: Looking for "random upvote" script
in thread Looking for "random upvote" script

The voter should be able to discern that a node is worthless within a short time frame....

Except for tutorials, meditations, snippets, reviews....

  • Comment on Re^2: Looking for "random upvote" script

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Looking for "random upvote" script
by bluto (Curate) on Dec 12, 2006 at 21:11 UTC
    I'm missing your point. If something deserves a down vote, it needs it now, not six months from now. If it's bad advice or just inflammatory, many eyes will see it and some will respond. A "Best Practice" post which seemed fine two years ago, may be down voted if posted today, but I fail to see the reason why one would hunt it down and down vote it now.

      Ah, I missed the word down in your original post. I still disagree, but much less strongly. I apologize for the confusion.