Re: How do you plan on spending your leap second?

in reply to How do you plan on spending your leap second?

Cool one, davido, but the "Computing the answer to the universe on my new 3GHz dual-core system." option is pointless, since we all know it: it's 42 =:cP

This option should be "Computing the question to the universe on my new 3GHz dual-core system."

Cheers and have a nice one! =:c)

Your PM friend,

Er Galvão Abbott
www.galvao.eti.br
Porto Alegre Perl Mongers

Comment on Re: How do you plan on spending your leap second?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: How do you plan on spending your leap second? by cog (Parson) on Dec 27, 2005 at 11:38 UTC
Hey, we all know a bunch of prime numbers and keep on calculating them over and over again!	[reply]
Re^2: How do you plan on spending your leap second? by QM (Parson) on Dec 27, 2005 at 15:00 UTC
This option should be "Computing the question to the universe on my new 3GHz dual-core system." Actually, the question was eventually (preventually?) found: What is 6 x 9? -QM -- Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of	[reply]
Re^3: How do you plan on spending your leap second? by Articuno (Beadle) on Dec 29, 2005 at 13:24 UTC
Actually that's not the real question (if you knew the question and the answer at same time, the universe would disappear and be replaced by something else :-) I don't know if I'll be "Watching the clock" or "Clocking the Watch"... (sorry, couldn't resist that) -- So Long and Thanks for all the Fish!	[reply]
Re^3: How do you plan on spending your leap second? by FreeBeerReekingMonk (Deacon) on Feb 01, 2016 at 19:26 UTC
I think you are on to something here, if you think the 69 like a yin-yang sign. However, perl doesn't think so, try: `perl -e 'print 6 x 9'` Must be that missing 12.... Personally, I think that the answer was given in an dyslexic way, and should have been 24. But if it still is 42, then the factors are 237, which on an upside-down TI82 would spell all letters... however, in which order should they be?	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: How do you plan on spending your leap second? by QM (Parson) on Feb 03, 2016 at 10:32 UTC
Personally, I think that the answer was given in an dyslexic way, and should have been 24. What if the question was in a different base? Obviously at least base 10, but perhaps higher. Hmmm.... -QM -- Quantum Mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of	[reply]

In Section Past Polls