in reply to Re^6: Tricks with DBI
in thread Tricks with DBI
Isn't all this other code just as broken if it uses prepare_cached with DBD::Sybase? And if it doesn’t use prepare_cached with DBD::Sybase, why would it be affected? And if you patch Class::DBI instead, wouldn’t that affect all CDBI apps, even those that shouldn’t be, like someone whipping up some quick using DBD::SQLite off at a corner of the environment? Patching DBD::Sybase seems to scope the fix to the right layer, whereas patching CDBI would be a scattershot that would affect code which shouldn’t be and miss code that should be.
(Note: I’m not arrogating any say in your decision, just pointing out what seems like a mistake to me. The call is obviously yours since you’re the one who’ll have to live with the consequences.)
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^8: Tricks with DBI
by thor (Priest) on Dec 26, 2005 at 15:46 UTC | |
Re^8: Tricks with DBI
by victor73 (Initiate) on Dec 27, 2005 at 06:45 UTC | |
by mpeppler (Vicar) on Dec 27, 2005 at 13:26 UTC |