Re^3: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)

http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=515173

in reply to Re^2: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)
in thread Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)

Well, there's Sony. At least they actually have deep pockets. ;)

Cheers,
Matt

Comment on Re^3: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again) by swampyankee (Parson) on Dec 08, 2005 at 15:23 UTC
Wasn't Sony recently involved in copy-protected "CD's" (technically, they're not CDs if they're copy protected; it's a violation of the applicable standards) installing malware on people's winboxes? emc Multics: 40+ years old, and immune to buffer overflow Visit Netlib	[reply]
Re^5: Attack on Perl or Perl's need better PR (again) by mojotoad (Monsignor) on Dec 10, 2005 at 06:16 UTC
indeed, swampyankee, this was my point. Labels such as the 'Villanous Cracker' can be very fluid, depending on the viewpoint -- a viewpoint being largely defined by 'media interests' (note: not artists). Anyway, that aside, Sony's recent 'solution' certainly qualifies from the engineering perspective stated above. Cheers, Matt	[reply]

In Section Meditations