in reply to What is this doing, and why is this a good method of doing it?
I'll bite, rather than switching strict refs off then on again is it a good method? Is there a side effect of switching I dont see?
Also why is the semicolon required before the no strict 'refs'?for (@x) { no strict 'refs'; *$_ = sub { use strict 'refs'; # ... }; }
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^2: What is this doing, and why is this a good method of doing it?
by japhy (Canon) on Jul 25, 2005 at 02:11 UTC | |
Re^2: What is this doing, and why is this a good method of doing it?
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 25, 2005 at 12:36 UTC |
In Section
Obfuscated Code