Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II

Some googling seems to indicate that [ and ] are the SGML entity names.

Abigail

Comment on Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II by jonadab (Parson) on Feb 12, 2004 at 14:49 UTC
Some googling seems to indicate that [ and ] are the SGML entity names. Some testing seems to indicate that Gecko doesn't support these, which probably means nothing else does either. Maybe I'll just put #91 in my sig... `$;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}} split//,".rekcah lreP rehtona tsuJ";$\=$ ;->();print$/` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Feb 12, 2004 at 14:58 UTC
Well, it's not an HTML entity name, so I'm not surprised. That however doesn't mean Perlmonks can't support it. After all, I doubt that Gecko, or anything else, supports `<readmore>`. I thought Perlmonks support was the issue at hand in the post I was replying to. Abigail	[reply]