Re^5: How I want my memory managed

http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=219946

in reply to Re: Re^3: How I want my memory managed
in thread How I want my memory managed

I know all that. :) My point is that reference counting is a technique of garbage collection.. so you got your terminology mixed up. What you meant to say is mark&sweep vs refcounting.

Makeshifts last the longest.

Comment on Re^5: How I want my memory managed

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^5: How I want my memory managed by MarkM (Curate) on Dec 15, 2002 at 02:48 UTC
Ah yes... terminology... sorry... :-) Replace every occurrence of 'garbage collection' with 'non-reference counted garbage collection' in posts that I made. The reason I made it more vague, is because there are more ways to perform non-reference counted garbage collection than 'mark & sweep'. The most obvious example is a 'copy' garbage collector. Technically, you are definately correct that reference counting is a form of garbage collection.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re^5: How I want my memory managed by dani++ (Sexton) on Dec 18, 2002 at 11:19 UTC
Uhhh... The information officer in Chaplin's movie about war is called 'Garbitch', so that means he's not using refcounting? Burp! Sorry, too much beer. =) dani++ (reference count increment)	[reply]

In Section Past Polls