in reply to RE: Flipper
in thread Flipper
But, why would we care?
I settled on this code because I believe it specifically addresses the large-scale operation we want, which is increment $flip each time, but reset it to zero when it gets to 4. As opposed to: set $flip according to the following formula...
Each time through, we want to increase the value of $flip by 1. The idiomatic way to say that is ++$flip.
What, fundamentally, is the difference between
and$flip = ++$flip % 4
(except being three characters longer) when the entire point is to increase $flip by 1?$flip = ($flip + 1) % 4
I guess my question is: why do you think I am throwing away a result which you only accomplish differently? "++" vs. "+ 1" -- they both add one to the value of $flip. See below for the readability benefits of using ++ to add one to a variable.
I like the shorter (by two characters, but hey...) version
but by your argument, you shouldn't like it, either, since it increments $flip, just to "throw the result of the += away." I don't understand your objection.($flip += 1) %= 4
It is also much closer to being needlessly obfuscated, with all the obvious negatives... (though my coworkers might be shocked to hear that I don't prefer obfuscation :-)
I'm sure you considered, as I did:
and rejected it because we want to emphasize the purpose of $flip, which is to cycle among the elements of the array. We assign to $flip to keep its value within the legal bounds. By this we make it obvious (at a glance) to the poor programmer who comes behind us that $flip will only hold values between (in this example) 0 and 3, because those are the only values we want.for (1..12){ print "$Cheers[++$flip % 4]\n"; }
I would argue that the preincrement adds a huge "obviousness" value for the aforementioned fellow programmer. ++$flip triggers an immediate (subconscious?) understanding of our intent. Similarly, <nobr>$flip = ++$flip % 4</nobr> is, I believe, immediately obvious in a way that <nobr>($flip += 1) %= 4</nobr> can never be. <nobr>($flip + 1)</nobr> is plain in its intent (make $flip increase by one each time), but not as plain as ++$flip.
Russ
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
RE: RE(2): Flipper (Maintainability vs. personal style?)
by turnstep (Parson) on May 21, 2000 at 20:41 UTC | |
by Russ (Deacon) on May 22, 2000 at 04:58 UTC |