http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1193258


in reply to Re^2: Find the last item in a series of files
in thread Find the last item in a series of files

A simple split to two parts may not be enough depending upon the OP's filenames and how many '.' characters might be contained within those names. I think that a regex assignment would be more appropriate instead of a split. But it could be that this is all the OP needs.

That's why using File::Basename seems a good idea as it provides an easy interface to extract path, files-basename and extension.

CountZero

A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

My blog: Imperial Deltronics

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Find the last item in a series of files
by Marshall (Canon) on Jun 22, 2017 at 22:13 UTC
    Yes, File::Basename is a fine idea. But that won't get you out of providing a regex in this particular situation. The functions either take a list of strings like ".txt". ".doc". Or a regex in qr// form. Of course the enumerated suffix strings are the easiest way to use these functions. However, in this particular situation with varying numeric suffixes, ".001", etc., I would think a regex is needed even if using File::Basename.
      File::Basename::fileparse can take a regex as an argument to extract the suffixes, so using qr/\.\d{3}/ will pick up the varying suffixes allright.

      CountZero

      A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

      My blog: Imperial Deltronics