in reply to Re^2: MJD's Contract Warnings - courtesy of Perlweekly
in thread MJDs Contract Warnings - courtesy of Perlweekly
My edits were redactions of sections saying what i could not do for 6 or 12 months afterward. I'm relatively sure there was no other intention.
I went back and forth on considering the reply. At first i thought someone else would consider it, and was surprised when it wasn't. Considering a post when i am the recipient seems tacky. Ultimately, after realizing he has an unpleasant attitude (for example, the enlargement of "fail") i figured he either has it in for me or just a jerk to everybody. I considered it to let the people decide, even though he is a well-known person here and the chances of his post being removed was small.
I do appreciate your explanation. However, as it needed to be explained, it wasn't quoted, and includes an expletive and epithet, i still think it is not an appropriate post.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: MJD's Contract Warnings - courtesy of Perlweekly
by jdporter (Paladin) on Apr 13, 2015 at 19:57 UTC | |
by chacham (Prior) on Apr 13, 2015 at 20:27 UTC | |
by syphilis (Archbishop) on Apr 15, 2015 at 11:15 UTC | |
by chacham (Prior) on Apr 15, 2015 at 12:42 UTC | |
by syphilis (Archbishop) on Apr 21, 2015 at 13:29 UTC | |
|