http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11137483


in reply to Re^2: How do you track nodes/replies of interest? (CSS for RAT and NN)
in thread How do you track nodes/replies of interest?

Hi

I remember a similar discussion when choroba (thankfully) came back from longer (CoViD related) offline-ness and tried to check on older discussions.

> Skipping huge list of notes

IIRC, this skipping depends on the number of nodes, not the time frame.

Well as PMDev I could check the code, but I'm quite busy right now.

Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery

update

see also Re: Problems with Newest Nodes (retrospection)

  • Comment on Re^3: How do you track nodes/replies of interest? (CSS for RAT and NN)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: How do you track nodes/replies of interest? (CSS for RAT and NN)
by kcott (Bishop) on Oct 13, 2021 at 17:42 UTC

    I rarely need to go back a week or more; it happens occasionally due to travelling, illness or similar. What I described is in line with what I've always seen. Before posting, I did check it: up to 7 days gave all "Notes"; 8 gave "skipping huge list".

    The disclaimer merely reflects my inability to provide absolute, factual evidence. It also indicates that I considered the possibility of a "$note_count > $huge_count" condition. I'm still happy to be corrected on this. :-)

    — Ken