http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=11135823


in reply to Re^4: Proposed change regarding "Taint" support
in thread Proposed change regarding "Taint" support

Not in that discussion, no. However if you go back to the original referenced post there is at least some support. Steffen himself says (his emphasis):

I would NOT want this to be the default behaviour, but having this an option could be a boon to people like my employer, who run Perl on thousands of machines and capacity is as important as latency.

And later ...

And while I'm at it: You distribution people out there: Don't ship a perl without taint support by default!

There were a few others in the Larry/Hippo camp back then including Tux and Reini. But perhaps I will badger the p5p echo chamber with my opinions again now so they don't think it is obsolete.


🦛

  • Comment on Re^5: Proposed change regarding "Taint" support