in reply to Re^2: The future of Perl?
in thread The future of Perl?
Moose, MOP, Moo, Mouse, and the advances that have arguably made Perl5 a superior OO language to Python and Ruby and Java
I'd like to see that argument!
I'm not against it; I'd just like to see:
- the benefits of Moose/Mop/et al. laid out;
- a comparison with the OO in those other languages.
My perception of Moose is that it is an expensive getter/setter generator. My perception of MOP is that is provides for introspection -- that has few if any legitimate uses.
I'd like to be persuaded that I'm wrong.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re^4: The future of Perl?
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Dec 13, 2014 at 23:22 UTC | |
by Arunbear (Prior) on Dec 14, 2014 at 14:37 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Dec 14, 2014 at 20:26 UTC | |
by Arunbear (Prior) on Dec 15, 2014 at 15:27 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on Dec 16, 2014 at 05:58 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Dec 15, 2014 at 22:55 UTC | |
| |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 14, 2014 at 21:07 UTC | |
by Your Mother (Archbishop) on Dec 15, 2014 at 00:30 UTC | |
| |
by morgon (Priest) on Dec 14, 2014 at 18:44 UTC | |
by vkon (Curate) on Dec 15, 2014 at 13:31 UTC |
In Section
Meditations