http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=1067174


in reply to Re^12: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
in thread Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

so the list should have been much shorter?
not 5 items, but rather 1? or even zero items in this list??

I am okay with small or even empty list, but the wrong one - stuffed with obviously wrong and repeated data - I want to trash it entirely and avoid it...

Was it intentionally made visually bigger to look longer??

  • Comment on Re^13: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^14: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 10: Kickstarter & Performance Benchmarks
by Will_the_Chill (Pilgrim) on Dec 23, 2013 at 12:10 UTC
    Hi vkon,

    You seem to think that RPerl and Kurila are the same project. This is not true. Perhaps you could investigate both projects more closely, then make your own list of similarities and differences?

    This would help me understand your point of view.

    Thanks!

    Perling,
    ~ Will the Chill
[reply]
      these are very different approaches, but there is some thing that makes these 2 very similar, ...

      there is one point (at least) where kurila had much more chances compared to rperl: it was lead by a very smart leader, who 1) deeply understood p5 internals, and 2) when asked for something provided quite thoughtful answers, instead of stuffing some list with repeated and wrong entries, for the only sake to make it bigger,

      In a sence, we have a score 2:1, kurila currently wins.

      It could be that the score will change in a future, but right now I do not see something that will really make rperl win this (imaginary) battle....

[reply]
        vkon,

        I try my best to give you good answers, I'm sorry you're not happy with my replies so far, I'll have to try harder next time.

        Perling,
        ~ Will the Chill
[reply]

In Section Perl News