Would have been nice if you could have named those "little things"

That's a fair point. Here's a modified version of the code doing what I think you might have been trying to do. I'm also realizing I may have misread the question, but I've got momentum now. Might as well paste what I have.

#!/usr/bin/perl

# Use the warnings pragma rather than the -w flag
use warnings;
use strict;

{ package One;

    # Define a constructor for One
    sub new {
        my $class = shift; # Constructors need to know what class they
+'re for

        my $self = {}; 
        bless($self, $class); # Tell Perl what $self is being blessed 
+into
    }   

    sub test {
        my $self = shift; # Is this an object method? Better grab $sel
+f

        my $x = pop @_; # I usually shift from the argument list, but 
+whatever
                        # Also, I like to be explicit about what I'm
                        # popping/shifting from
        print "$x\n";
    }   
}

{
    package Two;
    use base "One";
    # Two::new didn't add anything to One, so I removed it.

    sub eg {
        my $self = shift;  # Is this an object method? Better grab $se
+lf

        my $arg = pop @_;  # pop() again? Okay, break it out and make 
+it explicit.
        $self->test($arg); # Is test() an object method? I'll use it a
+s if it was.
    }
}


my $obj = new Two();
$obj->eg("hello");
[download]

Edit: Incidentally, I think jethro has the solution you're looking for. I've become so used to making everything explicit by spelling out object or module connections that I didn't even think of Exporter.