comment on

Pod::Coverage::Moose (0.02). Why The Following-

Test file

use strict;
use warnings;
use Test::Pod::Coverage;
use Test::More "no_plan";

pod_coverage_ok( "IsMoose",
                 { coverage_class => "Pod::Coverage::Moose" } );
[download]

IsMoose package file

package IsMoose;
use Moose;
has [qw( moo cow )] =>
    is => "rw",
    isa => "Str"
    ;

1; # (Update, added.)

=pod

=cut
[download]

Test output

> prove test-moose-pod.t -v
test-moose-pod.t ..
ok 1 - Pod coverage on IsMoose
1..1
ok
All tests successful.
Files=1, Tests=1,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr  0.00 sys +  0.21 cusr 
+ 0.01 csys =  0.24 CPU)
Result: PASS
[download]

Why isn't that failing? moo and cow are uncovered. This is a boiled down example. I tried several other permutations and my real code with Moose attribute methods and Roles and such are also passing as if it were being tested with plain Test::Pod::Coverage; e.g., only sub named {} are being checked at all.

Do I misunderstand what this does? Am I suffering from PEBCAK?

In reply to Does Pod::Coverage::Moose work or am I just being obtuse? by Your Mother

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks