Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
I could call frobnerize($self, ...) instead, but I'd like to use the object syntax for various reasons.

Paraphrasing the next paragraph: And you'd like to make object syntax not work for "everyone else".

It isn't particularly hard to come up with ways to make object syntax for a specific method to only work for some callers (I hope that restating your goals to make how they conflict with each other much clearer also makes the potential solutions much easier to see). And all of those ways suck.

Most of them don't even fix the real problem with breaking encapsulation. That is, you don't want your mix-in to break if it is used by a class that has its own frobnerize() method. So the real conflict in your goals boils down to:

For various reasons, you want $self->frobnerize(...) when written in your code to call your frobnerize(). But, for sound design reasons, you want other instances of $self->frobnerize(...) to call some other method or fail if no such other method exists.

Meanwhile, frobnerize($self,...) solves all of the important problems except the ones that you couldn't bring yourself to admit in public. (:

Just FYI, I'd like to get a pony for various reasons. And I don't want anybody else to be able to get a pony. ;)

BTW, if $self->Mixin::frobnerize(...) is too unwieldy for you (especially since the name of your mix-in is surely much longer than "Mixin"), you could use a code ref and $self->$frobnerize(...) with a simple my $frobnerize= \&frobnerize;. I also suspect that this may violate some of your "various reasons".

Note that I rejected my $frobnerize= sub { ... }; as then stack traces would report calls to such as being to __ANON__ instead of being to Mixin::frobnerize, and I consider that difference important since troubleshooting is too time-consuming compared to coding already.

- tye        


In reply to Re: How to write a Mixin without Exporter mess? (conflict) by tye
in thread How to write a Mixin without Exporter mess? by saintmike

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.
  • Log In?
    Username:
    Password:

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    Chatterbox?
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others taking refuge in the Monastery: (5)
    As of 2020-07-12 16:01 GMT
    Sections?
    Information?
    Find Nodes?
    Leftovers?
      Voting Booth?

      No recent polls found

      Notices?