Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Greetings, ye monks! I'm going to write a web front-end to some sysadmin things that I do. This is to allow users to do things themselves that I'm sicking of doing by hand. I'm on linux. I want to separate the must-run-as-root code from the web code. I'm thinking I'll have a CGI script and a seperate runs-as-root-script. The runs-as-root-script will do the actual privileged actions and the CGI will gather input from users and and pass the particulars onto the runs-as-root bit. I'm thinking the runs-as-root bit will be a constantly running service, so as to avoid suid. The cgi could talk to the run-as-root bit with unix sockets or something of that nature. As I see it, I'll need to authenticate the users twice: first in the CGI and second in the runs-as-root bit. I want to authenticate in the CGI so I can give users feedback, avoid bothering the runs-as-root bit unnecessarily and so on. I need to authenticate in the runs-as-root bit because even if I authenticate in the CGI, I don't think there's a way the runs-as-root bit can entirely trust the cgi or that a request is coming from the cgi. The cgi handles user interface and makes it possible for the runs-as-root bit to have a very limited, strictly-defined interface. In case I'm being unclear (my usual state) here's kindof how I envision a request going: User -> web browser -> cgi -> runs-as-root -> system So only the runs as root bit needs to run as root. My first and most important question is: does this make sense? Is it a dumb idea? Am I making this too complex?. My second question is: What's the best way to communicate between the cgi and the runs-as-root stuff? Is there any interprocess communication that guarantees input comes from a particular script? Security is my #1 priority. I hope this question is comprehensible, and thanks for any thoughts. --Pileofrogs In reply to Security, root and CGI? by pileofrogs
|
|