Just another Perl shrine | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Has anyone ever considered a Mandatory anonymous comment feature for a down vote?
If you down vote, you have to give a reason?
Allow the voter to remain anonymous, but at least make them think for a moment before they get to downvote a node.
/start rant
Personally I rarely down vote anything that is not blatantly incorrect, extremely rude, or someone trying to sneak in a school project without admitting it. The node that brought this up, is short(a definite ++), good to know (another ++), and probably very helpful to people that purchase future versions of the books. I just wonder why these people downvoted this node, I would like to see them defend their vote by commenting why they voted this way. /end rant In reply to Re: Posting "Other Users" on potential personality voters from now on
by scottstef
|
|