comment on

I'm not sure I agree with removing duped people, but there are a few easy ways perhaps to cut down on the 'glory' that is the worst node list.

We've already removed the negative number from people's experience and have replaced it with 'requires penance' or somesuch. I think we could do the same for these nodes. Why not just have it say something non-numeric in the worst nodes table? We also don't need to have it sorted per se. A bad node is a bad node. Does it really matter if it's the WORST of the worst nodes as compared to the SECOND worst?

Make those two changes and the worst node table is a quick ref of the worst nodes, in no particular order.

--
I used to drive a Heisenbergmobile, but every time I looked at the speedometer, I got lost.

In reply to Re: Trolling for Worst Nodes by KurtSchwind
in thread Trolling for Worst Nodes by Callum

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


laziness, impatience, and hubris
	PerlMonks