No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I must agree with tye here, not only with his opinion but
in addition to what I've seen with many cases posted in the
Usenet group news.admin.net-abuse.email (NANAE). Not until
it's noticed by the other party should it be
removed/censored/etc. (And I have to use legal terms here,
folks, apologies about that.) A proactive, preventive stance
can equally damage the monestary, by ruining it's perception
with the public.
Besides, when the (proper) paper cease and decist comes in, the monestary can gather more support by subsituting it for the questionable node (This looks to be the current trend). Also, the paper document is much more authentic than a possibly spoofed e-mail. Anyone reading NANAE knows this, save for the dumb kooks. While I sympathize with your legal difficuties, legal threats are just that: threats. The courts haven't recognized e-mail as a reliable transport of legal documents; only served documents and US Postal Mail (afaik) are authentic.
--
In reply to Re: Clear and present danger
by strredwolf
|
|