Do you know where your variables are? | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Unless you know in advance that there is a reasonable limit to how long a query will take to complete, you might like to consider the traditional approach of splitting the threads into submission threads and a separate transaction monitor. The latter is a daemon (detached process) which maintains a matrix of active queries and returns their results to the requesting processes. A submitter program is needed to communicate between the requester and the transaction monitor. The point is that otherwise all functionality needing to operate on the queries would need to stay alive in the same process until all others were done. By using a transaction monitor architecture, submitters can have any granularity they like down to a single query session or up to any number of asynchronous submissions from the same process without any dependence on each other for completion.
Both requesting processes and the transaction monitor still need a technical way to manage threads, forks, poe or whatever you choose, this having been already addressed in other posts. -M Free your mind In reply to Re: What's the best way to fetch data from multiple sources asynchronously?
by Moron
|
|