While I, personally, find the structure / length completely appropriate I do agree with:
1) The printing is terrible, dark-blue print with an ugly typeface on a mock graph paper background. And the faux "handwritten" side notes are actually as hard to read as somebody's handwriting. Typography is actually supposed to make something *easier* to read, not harder.
The mock graph paper and the right-justified typewriter font make reading the main text a pain. Everybody in the office whose read PDTN has agreed. Pity since the content's nice, and O'Reilly books are normally a model of clarity.
If you're new to Perl testing I'd definitely spend the extra effort to get past the presentation.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|