comment on

I'm all in favour of banning children from access to any form of social networking site online.

Social networking sites can not only put children at risk of predators, but content on social networking sites contains a mixture of useful and very bad information.

Not all social networking sites are bad - but I have no objection to even perlmonks being restricted to children whilst at school.

There's nothing wrong with doing what I did when at school: go visit a library and read technical magazines or non-fiction books.

In reply to Re: Proposed US ban on school/library access to 'social networking sites' by monarch
in thread Proposed US ban on school/library access to 'social networking sites' by g0n

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks