comment on

There was a request to create more accountability and/or discussion as to why a node was put on the Nodes To Consider. Our allmighty and forethinking master already included a simple way to make (optional) accountability possible, here is how I use the "Reason to consider"-edit box :

  ([Corion]) This node has personal attacks, which have no place here.
[download]

The engine then turns this on the Nodes To Consider page into

Reason: (Corion) This node has personal attacks, which have no place here.

If somebody then browses the Nodes To Consider, my nick is there and I can be easily contacted for further discussion on this node and my request.

The good thing about this is, that it is completely voluntary, if you don't want any discussion about why you proposed a node for editing or as food for the dark one, you don't need to put your name there.

Any comments / other suggestions are welcome !

In reply to Considerations of Nodes To Consider by Corion

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Do you know where your variables are?
	PerlMonks