Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

comment on

( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Off topic posts annoy me, but I can tolerate them better if the title makes it clear what the post is about.

Which of course should not apply only to off topic posts but to all posts: there are just too many questions that seem to refer to something and turn out to refer to something completly different - although I have to admit that sometimes it's difficult to come up with a good subject, and I've made my mistakes too...

(But I don't like questions marked OT. If you know it's off-topic, but you post anyway you're just bad)

You already know that our opinions slightly (slightlier than you probably think, that is) differ on this subject matter. In particular I think that it is sensible to put an OT marker under certain circumstances. Two scenarios that spring to mind are as follows:

  1. a fundamentally on topic post contains, possibly as a side note, an off topic comment. One feels like further commenting on that comment. Your opinion would probably be that he should plainly avoid to do so. IMHO there may be good reasons not to. If we were to adhere strictly to "your" recommendations things could get pretty boring here. As usual, it's mainly a matter of good sense: after all there's at least one case, that I remember, in which you did it yourself - in a subthread gone wildly OT, and that should have better been marked so, like I did in one of my own contributions to it;
  2. a reply may drift off topic wrt the post it is commenting, but still be on topic wrt Perl - why post it as a reply, then? Because it may have been arisen out of something discussed in that partcular post, if possibly not as the main topic. As usual, the edges are not sharp, but blurred...

In reply to Re^2: Rule change re: reaping OT nodes by blazar
in thread Rule change re: reaping OT nodes by friedo

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-03-28 18:28 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found