Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
How about making it all explicit, put $foo in its own package, and just be judicious in your use of the full name of $foo.
Or you could exploit the fact that my variables scope, while it stretches across packages declared in the same file, does not reach outside of the *file* in which they are declared. I.e. if in foo.pl you declare $foo with my, then that variable won't be visible inside subroutines declared in bar.pl A little more souped-up kind of idea might be to define an *object* with accessor methods. Syntactically annoying (which I gather is what you're trying to avoid =), but IMO, conceptually quite clean. final note: please, use a more descriptive title ... it might help others trying to solve the same problem =) Philosophy can be made out of anything. Or less -- Jerry A. Fodor In reply to Re: Stupid question
by arturo
|
|