Does it make sense to anyone else that chomp tests and carps about receiving a read-only parameter, before it tests whether it would require modification?
C:\perl-5.8.6>perl -e"chomp( 'fred' )"
Can't modify constant item in chomp at -e line 1, at end of line
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
Obviously, it doesn't make much sense to chomp a constant, but if your operating within a sub, you don't know what the user will pass you.
chomp is conditional. If the user passes a constant that doesn't need chomping it would be nice to allow that through without having to duplicate the tests inherent in chomp?
Examine what is said, not who speaks.
Silence betokens consent.
Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco.
20050317 Edit by castaway: Changed title from 'A premature ejaculation?'
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
Want more info? How to link or
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.