comment on

I've had good luck with HTML::Parser, but I think what you're asking for could end up being infinitely complicated.

You want to end up doing a high level compare, not a line by line or word by word compare. If you have to handle anyone's HTML, that could be impossible. If you're trying to version your own HTML, that will probably be easier -- you can focus on just a few tags.

I think I'd start by comparing the structure of the document for changes, and see where a paragraph has been added or a table row has been deleted. From there, I'd look at the text within the parts whose structure has not changed. Boy, that's a really interesting project. Let us know how it turns out.

Alex / talexb / Toronto

"Groklaw is the open-source mentality applied to legal research" ~ Linus Torvalds

In reply to Re: Comparison of HTML documents with Perl by talexb
in thread Comparison of HTML documents with Perl by sutch

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Perl Monk, Perl Meditation
	PerlMonks