keeping in line with a clinical theme, and because I haven't been using the " key enough today.
People submit code to a "waiting room" queue.
A "doctor" admits the "patient" for review.
After a week(?), the doctor publishes a write-up.
when somebody elects to review code, that code gets taken out of queue/ e-mailed to him/ jammed into a 'code I'm reviewing' nodelet.
While it's being reviewed, nobody else can see the code;this reinforces the clinic concept - rather than having 50 people giving suggestions, one person can write a coherent analysis.
After the analyst publishes his work, the node becomes open for commentary by the public.
I imagine that there be some threshhold at which people may elect to review, Monk or better?
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|