Think about Loose Coupling | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Produce 1 random pairing of the inputs for each input; where the pairings contain at least one sub element in common?
It's good, but it's not right</roy walker> I don't think there's anything random about it at all. I've added some more lines into the DATA, and still think my guess is right. edit: after a bit of googling for Roy Walker, I changed from "it's close, but it's not right." I really think I should have more important things to worry about. In reply to Re^2: nested combinations: algorithm advice?
by Jasper
|
|