comment on

Anonymous monks are welcome here.

But the fact that it came from an AM, and the fact that it ultimately offered no direct practical positive suggestions really stepped out of the spirit of PM for me.

I don't see the connection between the anonymity and your criticism (IMO, unfounded) of the content.

Let me say it again: anonymous monks are welcome here.

Indeed, the OPs question was immediately and succinctly answered by an AM.

It's entirely possible that that same AM was troubled that the OP didn't provide enough info to allow a response to give meaningful tips on where in the documentation to look, what tutorials would be helpful, etc. and followed up later with the suggestion for how to post a question that would indicate enough to allow a responder to give meaningful advice for further learning.

I would have a problem with AM's response if the actual question wasn't answered, but in this case, an answer was posted almost 2 hours before.

In reply to Re: Re: Re: skipping lines by ysth
in thread skipping lines by wolverina

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks