comment on

Different people pick up things differently. Educational research has shown that.

Some people learn by doing.
Some people learn by reading about it once.
Some people learn by reading it over and over again.
Some people learn by example.

Most people use a combination of the above in different situations, depending on how "at home" they are in the material they're trying to grasp. Obviously most people wouldn't even think of re-implementing Perl when they're trying to get to grips with the language in the first place.

But I guess sometimes, just sometimes a bright person comes along and does just that. Then it's up to the rest of the world to judge whether it is any good or not.

Liz

In reply to Re: Re: Learning methods (valid use for reinventing the wheel?) by liz
in thread Learning methods (valid use for reinventing the wheel?) by Fengor

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


go ahead... be a heretic
	PerlMonks