![]() |
|
P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Why not use exists() first, before attempting to assign the value? Why change the underlying operation of the language, when all you have to change is your methodology? I find it a useful practice, that whenever I expect a certain key in a certain hash, to use exists() to verify that the key exists before attempting to read its value. exists() will NOT create a key if it does not already exist. e.g.: if( exists($hash{"$key"}) ) { print("You have \$hash{'$key'}\n"); } else { print("You've messed up with \$hash and $key.\n"); } I'd absolutely hate it if anyone ever turned off the automatic creation of keys in a hash on any of my scripts. !c In reply to Re: non-autovivifing hash
by lofichurch
|
|