![]() |
|
Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
A teacher of mine said that an interpreter has a signature of: (P × D) ⇀ D Instead a compiler has a signature of: P ⇀ D ⇀ D Where P is the domain of programs, and D is the domain of data. So perl has a signature of the first kind: you give it the source and the data at the same time. cc, on the other hand, has asignature of the second kind: you give it only the source, and it produces another program, which is a function from data to data. So much for theory In practice, traditionally an interpreter has worked in a "miopic" way, looking at a single line (or even less) of code at a time; a compiler instead has always looked "at the big picture", swallowing the entire source at once, looking for problems and inconsistencies. So, in this way, Perl is a compiler. And on a sidenote, C is compiled to machine language, not assembly. Assembly is compiled to machine language by an assembler... -- dakkar - Mobilis in mobile In reply to Re: Re: How is a perl program processed ?
by dakkar
|
|