comment on

My other reply is rude, I appologize for that.

All the hash validation modules on CPAN are either very specialized or very complicated. I wanted to see if I could write one that was general *and* simple. I also have this idea for turning the 'hash profile' (coined by Data::FormValidator, I think) into a single independant function. This is quite possible (I'd need B::Deparse for verify =>{}'s that use subrefs, though), and the next revision should feature it.

Once Embperl 2 is out of beta, I'll likely use Embperl::Form::Validate, which looks nice. (I love HTML::Embperl :)

If I hadn't wrote Validate::Hash, I'd have gone mad. The form it is validating (address book thingy for my family) has 20 fields, and growing. Well, perhaps I already am mad, but we don't want us to get any worse.
Yes we do!
No we don't!

In reply to Re: Re: Validate::Hash by Dylan
in thread Validate::Hash by Dylan

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Welcome to the Monastery
	PerlMonks