comment on

no humor value
no information content
no useful pointers
no manners

Seriously, why does abusive crap like this get modded up? I can't see it as anything more than a waste of bandwidth. And many of the other posts in this thread are little better -- the pointers to existing modules and resources are certainly useful and appropriate, but there's no need to liven them up with comments like "explain why you suck." Reminds me of the bad parts of usenet sometimes. We can do better.

In reply to Re: Re: UberSecure v1.5.2 by educated_foo
in thread html/file security cgi [revisited] by UberDragon13

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
	PerlMonks