Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

comment on

( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??
Interesting idea about throwing away the result of ++. I disagree...

But, why would we care?

I settled on this code because I believe it specifically addresses the large-scale operation we want, which is increment $flip each time, but reset it to zero when it gets to 4. As opposed to: set $flip according to the following formula...

Each time through, we want to increase the value of $flip by 1. The idiomatic way to say that is ++$flip.

What, fundamentally, is the difference between

$flip = ++$flip % 4
$flip = ($flip + 1) % 4
(except being three characters longer) when the entire point is to increase $flip by 1?

I guess my question is: why do you think I am throwing away a result which you only accomplish differently? "++" vs. "+ 1" -- they both add one to the value of $flip. See below for the readability benefits of using ++ to add one to a variable.

I like the shorter (by two characters, but hey...) version

($flip += 1) %= 4
but by your argument, you shouldn't like it, either, since it increments $flip, just to "throw the result of the += away." I don't understand your objection.
It is also much closer to being needlessly obfuscated, with all the obvious negatives... (though my coworkers might be shocked to hear that I don't prefer obfuscation :-)

I'm sure you considered, as I did:

for (1..12){ print "$Cheers[++$flip % 4]\n"; }
and rejected it because we want to emphasize the purpose of $flip, which is to cycle among the elements of the array. We assign to $flip to keep its value within the legal bounds. By this we make it obvious (at a glance) to the poor programmer who comes behind us that $flip will only hold values between (in this example) 0 and 3, because those are the only values we want.

I would argue that the preincrement adds a huge "obviousness" value for the aforementioned fellow programmer. ++$flip triggers an immediate (subconscious?) understanding of our intent. Similarly, <nobr>$flip = ++$flip % 4</nobr> is, I believe, immediately obvious in a way that <nobr>($flip += 1) %= 4</nobr> can never be. <nobr>($flip + 1)</nobr> is plain in its intent (make $flip increase by one each time), but not as plain as ++$flip.


In reply to RE(2): Flipper (Maintainability vs. personal style?) by Russ
in thread Flipper by Russ

Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post; it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":

  • Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
    <code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
  • Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
  • Want more info? How to link or or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.
Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others having an uproarious good time at the Monastery: (6)
As of 2022-08-17 08:05 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found