It looks like an old and well-known (albeit somewhat obscure and tricky) problem in C (and C++): sometimes, you have to introduce sequence point (see for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_point
for more details) to make sure that all side-effects from previous evaluations are completed and that no-side effect from subsequent evaluations has been performed. If you don't do that, the behavior is undefined, which means that different C compilers may yield different results and still comply with the C standard; and I have actually observed such discrepancy of behaviors many years ago (some time in the last decade of last century) between two C compilers.
One of the typical ways to introduce a sequence point in such an expression is to add a comma. This is presumably the reason why your version with commas works as expected.
Update: fixed a couple of typos.
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.