comment on

I would keep it up, even if it's to let people know it exists. I'm always surprised that tools like this never take off. I remember "Third Voice" which let people share notes about a web page back in the early naughts. I thought it was amazing. I just found out about AnnoCPAN myself and was impressed. I'm glad to know it exists and someone went down this path. Sometimes contributions show others the way even if they don't become popular.

$PM = "Perl Monk's";
$MCF = "Most Clueless ~~Friar~~ ~~Abbot~~ ~~Bishop~~ ~~Pontiff~~ ~~Deacon~~ ~~Curate~~ Priest";
$nysus = $PM . ' ' . $MCF;
Click here if you love Perl Monks

In reply to Re^2: What's up with AnnoCPAN? by nysus
in thread What's up with AnnoCPAN? by Cody Fendant

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks