comment on

Operator overloading is great, I'm not against it per se.

But it's a two-edged sword which should be handled with care.

Overloading an operator because it looks like another syntax is not a good idea ( here >> )

A good example for overloading are set operations, because the logic is "compatible".

I could also attempt to use the logical && family but short circuiting could sabotage it.

Bitwise ~ | & ^ etc. might be another option tho ... and the analogy between sets and bit vectors might help.

Found Set::Scalar which has a good set of overloaded operators.

Cheers Rolf
_{(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)

Wikisyntax for the Monastery}

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.