No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
you are aware that "constructor" isn't even mentioned in your definition? ;)
calling [$a] a "literal constructor" is not far fetched. a non literal construction is in contrast to do { @a=($a); \@a } because it involves a variable. This it meets the definitions in perlglossary ("no variable") and is also mirrored in JS terminology which has 100% the same semantic.
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^6: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX
|
|