![]() |
|
Think about Loose Coupling | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
> That seems to be because a reference to a literal actually constructs a new scalar;
again more theories ... see how the ref to a real constant like a stays stable in Re^8: Shouldn't references be readonly? (updated) and please explain the difference to your allegedly constant 1 . > There is no such thing as a literal aggregate in Perl — the {} and [] operators are defined as constructors instead. Defined? ... Source?
Cheers Rolf In reply to Re^4: Shouldn't references be readonly?
by LanX
|
|