comment on

Currently using Nord for most everything (emacs, iTerm). Comments are muted, identifiers stand out, keywords are different but don't. Before that it was zenburn which has similar "low contrast" colors.

I like dark backgrounds and those two work well without being angry fruit salad (e.g. dark background solarized feels slightly LOUD).

Update: Actually I do use the monokai (c.f. emacs version) for bat (a colourizing cat(1) drop in) which is marginally irate fruit salad.

The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.
The cake is a lie.

In reply to Re: colours for syntax highlighting by Fletch
in thread colours for syntax highlighting by morgon

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


Do you know where your variables are?
	PerlMonks