Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
As recommended here I released the new module as sendmail-pmilter-1.20_01 and the testing bots seem to be happy with it so far. Almost by chance I saw that it's recommended to have a CONTRIBUTING file. The testing bots don't seem to have mentioned that I didn't have one, but I made one and now there's a 1.20_02 version in the works. I say 'almost' by chance because I was looking for help with quality. I'm sort of a fan of quality, in the sense of Title21, Chapter1, s820 or ISO9000 - both of which I've worked to. The closest I've got so far is a link on https://metacpan.org/release/Sendmail-PMilter labelled 'Kwalitee'. This links to a page which shows that a bot has done some useful checks on V1.00 of the module, but I don't see a way to get those checks dome on the development version. Am I looking in the wrong place? In https://www.cpan.org/modules/04pause.html there's mention of the QA mailing list (perl-qa-help@perl.org) so I checked the archives. Three posts in the last two years. I'm looking for help with bringing the content of Sendmail::PMilter-1.2x up to scratch - when I can find a definition of 'scratch'. Where else should I be looking? In reply to Re^9: Looking for the maintainer of Sendmail::Milter.
by GWHAYWOOD
|
|