"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Blah! All of which is completely and utterly irrelevant to this thread. Which isn't about any given project written in Perl; or even all projects written in Perl. No one, except you, has made the slightest mention of anything that relates to replacing anything with anything. Nor about the pros & cons of one language over another. The subject -- it's just up there in case you've forgotten -- is: The future of Perl? Other than your first post which amounted "I don't care cos I don't need Perl to evolve, -- which, in part, mirrors my own position; the difference being that I think it a shame to see my favorite language slip into obscurity even if it doesn't much affect me personally -- the rest of your blather is just irrelevant-to-the-discussion, scatter-shot straw-men, that you set up so you could knock them down. And you've even failed dismally to do that in any sort of a convincing way. Your analogies suck; your syllogism are made up; and your conclusions are illogical. And it's all irrelevant to the thread. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^2: The future of Perl?
by BrowserUk
|
|