"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Too much abstract freedom? N adjacent tree nodes, N neighbouring states, etc. Hm. I'm not convinced by that argument.
I think context and convention; along with conciseness and memorability are key here. For each element, one property is defined: the successor. Hm. Can you have a successor without a predecessor? And actually, this deals with both -- or potentially more:
And 'successor' tends to have mathematical connotations which don't apply to a list of *any*things. For the simple case of adjacent pairs, I toyed with forByTwo() :) With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^4: Want for a name? (between)
by BrowserUk
|
|