No such thing as a small change | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
but not reasoning for changing the hash algorithm itself Sure it is. A strong hash function is harder to attack. why you would do it on a hash-by-hash basis rather than a per-process basis. Concerns over information exposure of key order to an attacker. I don't get the reluctance to share this information? If there is any reluctance it is purely that of me wanting to avoid a long dialog repeating what has already been said elsewhere. I have a lot of demands on my time these days.
--- $world=~s/war/peace/g In reply to Re^13: Hash order randomization is coming, are you ready?
by demerphq
|
|