Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Come for the quick hacks, stay for the epiphanies.
 
PerlMonks  

Re: (MeowChow) Re: is 1; at the end of a PM still necessary in 5.6.1 ?

by mugwumpjism (Hermit)
on Jul 23, 2001 at 16:34 UTC ( [id://98989]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to (MeowChow) Re: is 1; at the end of a PM still necessary in 5.6.1 ?
in thread is 1; at the end of a PM still necessary in 5.6.1 ?

Simplifying, it's a good thing to end your modules with a `1;'

How boring. I prefer 69; or "peace";.

srand 3.14159; print join("", sort{rand 1<0.5}map{$_^"\037"}split m{ }x,"qmptk|z~wOzm??l]pUqx^k?j"),",\n";

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: (MeowChow) Re: is 1; at the end of a PM still necessary in 5.6.1 ?
by PrakashK (Pilgrim) on Jul 24, 2001 at 00:06 UTC
    How boring. I prefer 69; or "peace";.

    One of my colleagues ends his modules with:

    42;

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://98989]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-25 17:35 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found