Re^3: Errors in Worst Nodes


"be consistent"
	PerlMonks

Re^3: Errors in Worst Nodes

by ww (Archbishop)

on Jun 30, 2012 at 20:00 UTC ( #979260=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Errors in Worst Nodes
in thread Errors in Worst Nodes

Yes, sometimes there are an annoying, troublesome, puzzling "quite a few" of them but, OTOH, the annoying, troublesome, puzzling "quite a few" of them could all get thrown because a single adverse occurance is repeating itself.

In any case, the keepers of the Monastery are aware... and are using their stockpile of (name your favorite insecticide) to try to stop any further repetitions.

Thanks for your concern. Wish I had happier answer.

Comment on Re^3: Errors in Worst Nodes

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Errors in Worst Nodes by Anonymous Monk on Jun 30, 2012 at 22:28 UTC
It better not be toxic to oysters.	[reply]
Re^5: Errors in Worst Nodes by CountZero (Bishop) on Jul 01, 2012 at 11:34 UTC
Oysters??? CountZero A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James My blog: Imperial Deltronics	[reply]
Re^6: Errors in Worst Nodes by frozenwithjoy (Priest) on Jul 01, 2012 at 11:39 UTC
maybe: oysters...pearls...perl?	[reply]
Re^7: Errors in Worst Nodes by CountZero (Bishop) on Jul 01, 2012 at 21:33 UTC

In Section Perl Monks Discussion

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://979260]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others meditating upon the Monastery: (5)

As of 2020-08-09 21:28 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?

Which rocket would you take to Mars?

Results (55 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices^?